Honest and open

How I rate tools

Can you actually trust a review website? That's a fair question, which is why I put the whole process out in the open here. Every verdict rests on verifiable sources and five fixed criteria, exactly the same for every tool. That's how you choose the right SEO tools, without guesswork.

no gut feeling, but a fixed yardstick. by Tijn
4 verifiable sources 5 fixed criteria 1 overall score
Four sources

Every verdict rests on four sources

I never lean on one source alone. My verdict lives where these four overlap.

01

Official information

What the makers themselves say. The tool's own website, help docs, and release notes.

02

My own hands-on test

I use the tools myself for real clients and projects, not just a quick demo.

03

User experiences

I line up all the reviews from independent platforms and never let a few stray reviews throw me off.

04

My own screenshots

Every screenshot is mine, so you see the tool the way I saw it.

You'll find my verdict where these four overlap.

Five criteria

Five criteria, one overall score

Every tool gets a score on the same five points. Together they make up the overall score out of 5.

Overall score
Ease of use9.0

How quickly you can get your first results without a manual.

Core function9.2

How well the tool does what you actually buy it for.

Reports8.0

Whether the insights are clear and you can actually act on them.

Support8.4

How quickly and helpfully you get support when you're stuck.

Price and value8.4

What you get for what you pay, weighed honestly.

Each part gets a score from 1 to 10. I divide the average by two, and that's the overall score out of 5. Not some separate number I just slap on. The tool finder uses those same five sub-scores too. It reweighs them, because what matters most to you decides which tool comes out on top for you.

What's always fixed

My promises, I don't budge from them

Whatever happens, these three things are set.

I always name the real downsides

The weak points too, not just the good ones. That's exactly what makes a review useful.

No paid placements

A tool can't buy its way up my ranking. Not for money, not for favors.

Independent of any commission

An affiliate link doesn't change my verdict. I only recommend what I'd use myself.

Trust my method but don't want to figure it all out yourself? Then let the tool finder do the thinking and within two minutes you'll see which tool best fits your situation.

Up to date

A score with an expiration date

Prices change. Features come and go. AI visibility is in full flux. A verdict from today may not hold next year.

That's why I revise reviews regularly. Every review clearly shows when I last checked it, so a score is never a snapshot without an expiration date.

GEO Also tested

Does the tool help you in AI answers?

Beyond classic SEO, I check whether a tool actually makes you visible in AI answers like ChatGPT and AI Overviews. That counts for more all the time and changes fast.

Tool finder

Not sure which tool to choose?

Let me ask you eight short questions and I'll tell you which SEO and AI-visibility tools fit your situation best.

On the results page you'll also find the full review of each tool, so you can dig deeper right away.

Try the tool finder 8 questions · about 2 minutes
Frequently asked questions

One more honest answer

Do you earn from the tools you recommend?
Sometimes. If you buy a tool through a link, I may earn a small commission. You don't pay anything extra for that and it doesn't change my verdict. I only recommend what I'd use myself.
Do you really test every tool yourself?
Yes. I create an account for every tool and use it for real clients and projects. What I haven't tested myself, I don't rate either.
How often do you update your verdict?
As a rule, whenever something important changes. Think price, features, or AI visibility. On top of that, I go through all my articles regularly to keep even the smallest details up to date. Every review shows when I last checked it.
Can a tool pay for a higher spot?
No. Positions and scores aren't for sale. A maker can submit their tool and correct factual errors, but payment has no influence on the conclusion.
What if I don't agree with your verdict?
Even better. Let me know. If I've got a fact wrong, I'll fix it. If we simply disagree, I'd still like to hear why. That keeps me sharp and it makes the articles better.

Don't see your question here? Feel free to ask it